 |
Back To Body Cleanse Research |
|
|
|
|||
|
||||
Study #1
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS:
Table-1: Compounds identified in water after full Ionator Treatment procedure.
|
COMPOUNDS IDENTIFIED |
Without
Ionator Treatment
|
With
Ionator Treatment
|
General information |
mg/l
|
mg/l
|
||
|
Alkylbenzene Sulphonate |
ND |
3.2 |
Used in Detergents and Soaps |
|
Alkyl phenol ethoxylates |
0.2 |
4.5 |
|
|
Cationic Quaternary Ammonium |
ND |
2.8 |
Surfactants |
|
Alkyl aryl sulphonic acid |
ND |
1.3 |
Unknown |
|
Tri-alkyl aluminium |
ND |
2.2 |
Anti-perspirant and from Fatty Acids |
|
Alkyl-benzene-sulphonate |
ND |
0.55 |
Unknown |
|
Sodium Tri-polyphosphate |
ND |
1.2 |
Detergents |
|
Methyl chloride |
ND |
0.8 |
Petroleum & Refrigeration |
|
Naphthalene’s (Total) |
ND |
1.4 |
Insecticides & Fungicides |
|
Benzyls (Total) |
ND |
0.3 |
Petroleum |
|
Organic Ammonia (Total) (R-N-RH) |
ND |
2.43 |
Normally used as raw material in agricultural industry |
|
Calcium Phosphate Ca (H2PO4) 2 |
ND
|
0.23 |
Use as raw material in various industries |
|
Alkyl Oil (RCOOR) |
ND |
0.46 |
Suspected to be natural skin oil |
|
Nicotine Sulphate |
ND |
0.08 |
Smoking & Contact Insecticide |
|
Dimethoate |
ND |
0.08 |
Aphid Insecticide |
|
Acetaldol |
ND |
0.22 |
Used to denature alcohol |
|
Mercaptans
(R-S-R) |
ND |
0.08 |
Used to denature alcohol |
|
Formal |
ND |
0.05 |
Plastics Industry |
|
Phthalonitrile |
ND |
0.08 |
Dye Industry |
ND = Not
Detected
|
Please Note;
This report only relates to the actual water sample supplied and analysed. No
responsibility can be accepted, related to the use of these results and
recommendations provided. |
1. SAMPLING
The two columns
of data represent the following samples collected.
Sample-1: Feet placed in lukewarm water
and left in the water for a time period of 30 minutes without implementation of
Ionator treatment process.
Sample-2: Feet placed in lukewarm water
and put through a complete Ionator treatment procedure.
2. DISCUSSION:
The points to take into consideration are the
following:
I.
Only the compounds or
constituents not identified in
Sample-1, but noted in Sample-2 were logged in the above analytical
Table-1. Compounds found in both samples
of water were omitted from the Table-1, simply due to the fact that it can be
stated that these compounds were present in any case and that it thus can be expected
to be found in Sample-2.
II.
Please note that the units
of measurement are recorded in micro-grams per litre or parts per billion, in
contrast to the previous analytical tests performed where the units were
recorded in mill-grams per litre or parts per million. In other words the concentration of compounds
noted can be regarded as diminutive.
III.
The literature available,
related to the toxicity of the above compounds identified, mostly recorded all
toxic tests and levels at concentrations in the order of mg/l. In other words speaking in conventional
medical terms, the concentration levels noted were found to be far below
concentration levels of concern.
IV.
In contrast homoeopathically
speaking the concentration levels of most of the compounds picked up can be
regarded as significant.
V.
For interest sake the
compounds identified were linked to processes or products. It is merely an attempt to possibly link the
source of the compounds identified, but by no means is stated as a categorical
fact.
VI.
It can however categorically
be stated that
the compounds noted in Sample-2 cannot be generated via the Ionator equipment,
since all surfaces (electrodes) were thoroughly cleaned before use.
VII.
It is my personal belief
that the compounds noted in Sample-2 were in fact generated during the
treatment procedure and can only be attributed to the interaction of the
Ionator equipment with that of the subject’s body.
VIII.
For some compounds noted it
is clear that these could feasibly and easily be pulled off or out the body
(feet in this case), as a result of the ionisation process. In contrast some of the compounds noted were
surprising and unexpected, and the mechanism of extraction or volatilisation
into the water analysed, is personally not fully understood. For example, respectively the compounds
linked to detergents or soaps versus some of the exotic organics noted.
At this stage the above points are all I can think of and which I
personally regard as of significance.
Please have a look through the analytical data and see if any questions
crop up. It will be interesting to think
any additional thoughts through carefully in an attempt to clarify the
ionisation process under examination.
The one simple statement I can however make is that it was surprising to
me, to see the range of compounds identified in the water, after the treatment
process.
Thanking you for allowing me to be of service and assuring you of me
best possible attention. If any additional information is required please do
not hesitate to contact me.
Yours sincerely
Gordon Reid
Water & Waste Water Treatment Division